Neutral Relationships

The definition of Neutral (Adjective) is - 1. Not helping or supporting either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.; impartial 2. Having no strongly marked or positive characteristics or features. I started with the definition of neutral cause I believe that is the direction that the western societies are heading in terms of relationships between couples. Modern western civilizations are heading in the direction as I previously stated before, where we are slowly decreasing the number of kids we bring into the world for a variety of reasons (See Black Thoughts 101 - May) What I'm going to touch on in this post, in particular, is the roles that males and females no longer play in today's modern societies and the effects it causes. Every culture has traditions. Some of these traditions are very positive, play a pivotal role in society as a whole and also for some is the only way they know how to do things. Traditional things can even include a man going to hunt for food, a woman staying at home to raise the children of the family taking care of the house and even things like a man putting gas in the car of a female driver even if that is not his partner. Different ethnicities breed different cultures. What you get is the foundation of a tribe that blossoms to a community that evolves to a nation. I'm sure the start of these roles that men and women, played on the strengths each person had for whatever situation. What I think has transpired from there is that women roles became less valued and therefore created an effect that made women look at men's roles as something to aspire to with the assumption that this would bring "equality". I'm all for women being equal to men I understand the hardships that women have gone through to get as far as they are now but my question is this. If most men don't do the roles of women and women no longer want to contribute to this role as much as they did before then will traditional families become extinct? Self-love and self-sufficiency have turned into extreme feminism and the agenda to emasculate men. This isn't an attack on women. I truly love and adore women for everything they possess. I personally believe that women are the most valuable creatures (Yes we are all animals) on this earth. Its because I value women so much that it frustrates me that they want to participate in the world of low self-esteem, egomaniac, entitled men. The agenda to seek equality for women is a good cause its something that's long overdue. What I believe is happening tho is that for every battle women are winning they are losing focus of the core objective. The objective is respect, appreciation for their contribution to society (basically existence) and to be equally rewarded for their contributions. The objective is also being limitless. Limitless in what they can and can't do what they can achieve and what they can bring to the table. But if we are both bringing the same things to the table then we are missing something? If we're bringing the same thing to the table then is the opposite sex needed? If I'm bringing in money and security and you bringing in money and security then wheres the love? What also transpires is if a woman decides to take the role of being a provider (which a lot of women already are) and neglects to be a nurturer, and her partner decides to pick up the slack they are creating a new tradition that conflicts with the tradition they may both stem from. This brings the opinions of other family members who are still in the original tradition and at times applies a strain to couples because deep down it's in their nature and upbringing to want to keep the core values they grew up with. What I believe today's men and women need to decide is that if you want there to be equality do you want it to be absolutely complete equality? meaning everything can be done by both sets of people (Naturally impossible) or wouldn't it be better that both men and women evolve to their physical and mental best in a way that gives them the skills knowledge and resources to do both but also gives them the logic to know one person is better suited to do one thing better than the other? If we don't make this decision and make them fast, we will be heading in a direction that neutralises relationships. Providing nothing personal and genuine between the partners but will provide the taxes and finances for the governments that are pushing the agenda of decreasing the populations and mentally influencing us to solely focus on generating individual wealth that stops at the individual as there are no more legacies being left behind by the average working-class man. Intimacy is being lost as generations of people progress. The focus is no longer on adding the animalistic nature that we all possess of mating and reproduction and the details that come with it. It's becoming about different genders coming together based on social and financial status and generating wealth but losing the details of love and forming business partnerships instead.